- MESTRENOVA UNKNOWN FORMAT OF FILE FID MOVIE
- MESTRENOVA UNKNOWN FORMAT OF FILE FID SOFTWARE
- MESTRENOVA UNKNOWN FORMAT OF FILE FID FREE
- MESTRENOVA UNKNOWN FORMAT OF FILE FID MAC
For example: the probe was at 240 K and the software reported the value 298 K. In the case I am writing about, you had a value of temperature stored in your file that had nothing to do with the actual temperature at which the spectrum was acquired. Whatever Bruker does is forgiven by its loyal customers. I wonder if Bruker is a cult more than a instruments-maker.
MESTRENOVA UNKNOWN FORMAT OF FILE FID MAC
If you are so lucky to own a vintage 68K Mac (mine died), look somewhere else.įor the most part of its life-cycle, XWin-NMR did contain a huge hole and nobody used to complain. If you are so poor that you couldn't buy a new Mac in the last four years, chances are that SwaN-MR will run on your old machine. NMR is so vast a field that all programs have at least one hole: they never find the time to cover the whole gamma.Īt the risk of being liable, today I uploaded the definitive version of SwaN-MR at. The lethal bullet can arrive from any of these sources, but the first cause alone would suffice.
MESTRENOVA UNKNOWN FORMAT OF FILE FID FREE
If they had really loved the free software they'd a least tried to save it. The beneficiaries of freeware also receive their salaries and their grants, therefore their choice was not dictated by economical motivations. I don't mean that it would have been different, but it certainly wouldn't have hurt, if the beneficiaries had cited more frequently their softwares, reviewd them, evangelized them. And when the money arrives no more the programmer (being him no saint) quits.
MESTRENOVA UNKNOWN FORMAT OF FILE FID MOVIE
When the sponsor realizes that even the stinkiest movie gets more attention than the best-crafted NMR program, that's the moment when the flow of money stops. Vomiting as it can be, this is the reality. Even youtube movies get their reviews, but NMR softwares don't. No external author ever cares to write a review. In some cases they may add a poster or a follow-up paper, and by that time they realize they are scraping the bottom of the barrel. All that the sponsor can get is a publication, written by the author himself. NMRPipe went near to that status, yet was limited in platforms (only UNIX) and in applications (mainly 2D). The only hope is to become the standard of the field. Unfortunately, for the users, the day arrived when the sponsors realized that this kind of software brings no fame. I used to receive my regular salary when writing freeware and renounced to it to write commercial software. This has been my case and the case of all the NMR freeware I know about. They write it for the money and they stop writing it when they don't receive money anymore. Only one word can explain why people writes it: money. If NMR freeware is never celebrated, and if the author of any free program is never remembered, the probability of becoming famous writing it are zero. The questions is: why there is so much NMR freeware around, that all web lists are rapidly outdated? It is well proven that the authors of freeware never become famous, and I mean any kind of freeware, I don't mean the NMR niche. My ideal list would just contain a unique recommendation per OS. The only (minor) defect is that the list contains more than one entry per operative system. Apart from this inconvenient, it's nearly perfect. It's 3 years old, which is, unfortunately, too much for such a rapidly evolving field. A well written list of NMR freeware can be found at:
0 kommentar(er)
